Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
JUIKTI applies a rigorous and transparent peer-review process to maintain the academic quality, originality, methodological soundness, and relevance of published articles.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Teknik Informatika (JUIKTI) uses a double-blind peer-review system. The identities of authors are concealed from reviewers, and the identities of reviewers are concealed from authors throughout the review process.
Review Workflow
01
Manuscript Submission
Authors submit their manuscripts through the JUIKTI online submission system. The submitted manuscript should comply with the journal's author guidelines, ethical requirements, and manuscript preparation standards.
02
Initial Editorial Screening
The editorial team evaluates the manuscript for relevance to the journal's focus and scope, originality, basic scientific quality, completeness, formatting, ethical considerations, and compliance with the author guidelines.
03
Similarity and Research Integrity Check
Manuscripts may be screened using an appropriate similarity-detection system and evaluated for potential plagiarism, duplicate publication, unethical research practices, or other research-integrity concerns.
04
Reviewer Selection
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to qualified and independent reviewers with relevant expertise. JUIKTI normally seeks evaluation from at least two independent reviewers.
05
Double-Blind Review
Reviewers independently evaluate the manuscript based on academic quality, originality, relevance, methodology, analysis, results, discussion, references, clarity, and overall contribution to the field.
Key Review Criteria
Originality
Novelty and originality of the research contribution.
Novelty and originality of the research contribution.
Methodology
Appropriateness and rigor of the research methods.
Appropriateness and rigor of the research methods.
Results
Validity, clarity, and adequacy of research findings.
Validity, clarity, and adequacy of research findings.
Discussion
Interpretation and connection with relevant literature.
Interpretation and connection with relevant literature.
References
Relevance, quality, accuracy, and appropriate use of references.
Relevance, quality, accuracy, and appropriate use of references.
Presentation
Clarity, organization, language, figures, tables, and overall presentation.
Clarity, organization, language, figures, tables, and overall presentation.
06
Editorial Decision
Based on the reviewers' recommendations and the editor's assessment, the manuscript may receive one of the following decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
07
Revision and Re-evaluation
When revisions are requested, authors must respond to reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript through the journal's submission system. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.
08
Final Acceptance and Publication
Accepted manuscripts proceed to the editorial production process, including copyediting, proofreading, metadata verification, DOI assignment, and final publication.
Reviewer Responsibilities
- Evaluate manuscripts objectively and independently.
- Maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
- Identify relevant methodological, ethical, and scholarly concerns.
- Provide constructive comments that can assist authors in improving their manuscripts.
- Declare any potential conflict of interest before reviewing.
- Avoid using unpublished information obtained during the review process for personal or professional advantage.
Author Responsibilities
- Submit original work that has not been published elsewhere.
- Provide accurate and complete information about the research.
- Respond professionally and substantively to reviewer comments.
- Disclose relevant conflicts of interest and funding information.
- Ensure that all authors meet appropriate authorship requirements and approve the submitted manuscript.
Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest
Manuscripts submitted to JUIKTI are treated as confidential documents. Editors and reviewers must protect the confidentiality of the submitted work and must not use unpublished information for personal or professional purposes. Reviewers are expected to decline assignments when a potential conflict of interest may compromise their impartiality.
Appeals and Editorial Decisions
Authors who wish to appeal an editorial decision should provide a clear and reasoned explanation addressing the decision and relevant reviewer comments. Appeals are considered by the editorial team based on academic and procedural grounds. The final decision rests with the journal's editorial authority.
Commitment to Peer-Review Quality
JUIKTI is committed to maintaining an objective, confidential, and academically rigorous peer-review process. Peer review is conducted to support the integrity and quality of scholarly communication and does not constitute a guarantee of publication.
